Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Courtney Butler (98-5552) and Julius Retic (98-5554)

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 29, 2000No. 98-5552, 98-5554Published

1Concurrence

NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge,

concurring, with COLE, J., joining.

We concur in the judgment announced by Judge Clay, and with most of Judge Clay’s well-reasoned opinion. Nevertheless, we believe defendant Retie, in addition to prevailing for the reasons stated in II.B.2, correctly asserts that the United States Sentencing Commission failed to comport with a clear Congressional directive when it eliminated the requirement that the defendant be at least twenty-one years old to be subject to enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.4. We therefore respectfully disagree with regard to the analysis in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. United States v. LaBonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. United States v. KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API