United States v. Courtney Butler (98-5552) and Julius Retic (98-5554)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Concurrence
NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge,
concurring, with COLE, J., joining.
We concur in the judgment announced by Judge Clay, and with most of Judge Clay’s well-reasoned opinion. Nevertheless, we believe defendant Retie, in addition to prevailing for the reasons stated in II.B.2, correctly asserts that the United States Sentencing Commission failed to comport with a clear Congressional directive when it eliminated the requirement that the defendant be at least twenty-one years old to be subject to enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.4. We therefore respectfully disagree with regard to the analysis in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. LaBonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.