Legal Opinion

Sproul v. Russell

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 4, 1932No. 30,587PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This action was to recover money which plaintiff alleged had been wrongfully obtained from him by defendant. Judgment was for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

Appellee is a dentist practicing at Sedan. The petition alleged that appellant contracted with appellee for a set of a false teeth. The petition further alleged that a set was made by appellee, which did not fit, but that appellant had paid appellee the full price for the teeth before he learned that they would not fit. The petition alleged that appellee then measured appellant for a second…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Griffith v. MarshSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  2. Underwood Typewriter Co. v. AndresonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. Everett v. EverettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Emrie v. TiceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  2. Barker v. FlemingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  3. Bisagno v. LaneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  4. Davis v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API