Legal Opinion
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Spancrete of Illinois, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 7, 1989No. 89 C 1969PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BUA, District Judge.
In this declaratory judgment action, plaintiff Aetna Casualty & Surety Company (“Aetna”) asks the court to find that Aetna has no duty to defend or indemnify one of its insureds, defendant Spancrete of Illinois, Inc. (“Spancrete”), in connection with one count of a personal injury suit filed against Spancrete in state court. Aetna and Spancrete have now filed cross motions for summary judgment, each urging the court to enter judgment in its favor as a matter of law. For the reasons stated herein, Spancrete’s motion for summary judgment is granted in its entirety;…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. PeppersIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
- Stanley Green, as Assignee of Dexter Hopkins, Cross v. The J.C. Penney Auto Insurance Company, Inc., a Corporation, Defendant- Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Olympic, Inc. v. Providence Washington Insurance Co. of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Tews Funeral Home, Inc. v. Ohio Casualty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. Bazzi Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bell, Boyd & Lloyd v. Jack W. TapyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Indiana Insurance v. Hydra Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Desert Mountain Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Data Specialties, Inc. v. Transcontinental Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- VIKING CONST. MAN. v. Liberty Mut. Ins.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.