Legal Opinion
United States v. Curtis Reynolds, William Parran. Appeal of William Parran
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 18, 1983No. 82-5628PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM, Jr., Circuit Judge.
William Parran, defendant/appellant, and a co-defendant, Curtis Reynolds, were indicted by a federal Grand Jury in the Western District of Pennsylvania. Count One of the three-count indictment charged that Parran and Reynolds, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, conspired with each other to violate 18 U.S.C. § 1708 by possessing a Pennsylvania unemployment compensation check, knowing that the check had been stolen. It also charged that Parran and Reynolds conspired to violate 42 U.S.C. § 408(g) by using the social security number of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- United States v. McGloryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. DukagjiniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Thomas Ryan v. David H. Miller, Superintendent, Eastern Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Leon DukagjiniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.