Legal Opinion

Russell v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 19, 1968No. 30-65PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :*

Plaintiff seeks retirement pay allegedly due him because of disability extant at the time of his release from military service on May 27, I960.1 Plaintiff describes his condition as psychosis or psychoneurosis. Either condition, if properly established by medical examination, qualifies under appropriate Air Force regulations as a disability sufficient to warrant retirement. Defendant claims that plaintiff was suffering from a character and personality disorder at the time of his release from active service. If defendant’s contention is sustained, plaintiff did not suffer from a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Service v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Vitarelli v. SeatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  5. WPC Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Francis G. Brown v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  2. Harold Unterberg v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  3. Merson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  4. Russell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  5. Walls v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API