Legal Opinion

United States v. Eric Duke

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 2, 2013No. 11-3394, 11-3544, 11-3397PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION

SUTTON, Circuit Judge.

Eric Duke and Bernard Kurlemann sold expensive homes to straw buyers who had little income and insufficient cash to make down payments on the sales. The effective buyers, once the scheme unraveled and the buyers defaulted, became the banks. Federal prosecutors caught wind of the deception and charged Duke and Kurlemann with making false statements to a lending institution and on top of that charged Kurlemann with bankruptcy fraud. Duke pled guilty; Kurlemann went to trial. Duke appeals his sentence; Kur-lemann appeals his jury conviction. The government…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. David MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. Richard PaulusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  3. Duramax Diesel Litig. Andrei Fenner v. Gen. Motors, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
  4. State v. MayOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. United States v. Michael E. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API