Legal Opinion

In the Interest of B.I.V.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1994No. D-3252PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Per curiam

Dolores Valadez brought this suit against Raul Longoria to establish his paternity of her child, B.I.V. Longoria moved for summary judgment on the ground that the child had a presumed father, thus barring a paternity action as a matter of law. At the time Valadez brought her suit, Section 13.01(a) of the Family Code specifically limited the filing of a paternity suit to those situations in which the child involved had no “presumed father.” Section 12.01(a)(1) of the Family Code provided, then as now, that a man married to the mother of a child at the time of the child’s birth is presumed to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Massey v. Armco Steel Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Texas Department of Corrections v. HerringTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Texas Highway Department v. JarrellTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  4. M & M Construction Co. v. Great American Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
  5. Attorney General of Texas v. LavanTexas Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Keck, Mahin & Cate v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Bohannan v. Texas Board of Criminal Justice, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
  3. Wyatt v. Longoria, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2000
  4. Heil Co. v. Polar Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2006
  5. Higbie Roth Construction Co. v. Houston Shell & Concrete, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API