Legal Opinion
Cooke v. Town of Colorado City
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided February 13, 2013No. CV 10-08105-PCT-JATPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1100ORDER
JAMES A. TEILBORG, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are (1) the Town of Colorado City’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 264); (2) the Cooke Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 266); (3) the City of Hildale, Hildale-Colorado City Utilities, Twin City Power, and Twin City Water Authority’s (collectively, the “Hildale Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 267); and (4) the State of Arizona’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 269). The Court now rules on the Motions.1
I. BACKGROUND2
In this case, Plaintiffs allege that Defendants discriminated against…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Robin Orr v. Bank of America, Nt & SaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Olmos v. Well PathDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
- Oxford House Inc v. Township of North BergenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2025
- Southwest Fair Housing Council v. ForwoodDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022