Legal Opinion

St. John v. Crocker

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1935Published

1Opinion of the CourtBrewster, J.

The complaint is for a quantum meruit recovery for certain conduct of and services performed by plaintiff pursuant *664to an oral contract, the substance whereof is alleged as follows: that plaintiff agreed with defendant that she would “ cease the activities in which she was then engaged in an investigation of the gambling. situation in the City * * * of Saratoga Springs, New York, and devote her entire time and attention to a program and investigation then being carried on by the defendant pertaining to the alleged misconduct of certain duly elected public officials; * * * transfer her…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hazelton v. SheckellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Haynes v. . RuddNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Lyon v. . MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  4. Mills v. . MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  5. Gray v. . HookNew York Court of Appeals · 1851

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API