State v. Applegate
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.
The court of appeals erred by reversing the trial court’s determination that the officers’ warrantless entry into Applegate’s home was justified by exigent circumstances. Exigent circumstances justify a warrantless entry into a residence by police when police are at the residence pursuant to an emergency call reporting domestic violence and where the officers hear sounds coming from inside the residence which are indicative of violence.
A warrantless police entry into a private residence is not unlawful if made upon exigent circumstances, a “specifically established and well-delineated…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lewis L. Wayne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
3Cited by57 opinions
- Maureen Tierney, for Herself and as Mother of Philip T. Newton, Patrick J. Newton v. Joel R. Davidson Thomas E. Williams, State of VermontCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- State v. DunnOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. RussellOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. Brewster, Unpublished Decision (6-11-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. SharpeOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.