Legal Opinion
Ottenheimer Bros. v. Libuwitz
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided January 5, 1937No. 4091PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SOPER, Circuit Judge.
Two patents were involved in the first appeal in this case (C.C.A.) 74 F.(2d) 858, the Peterson patent No. 1,206,464 and the Ottenheimer reissue patent No. 16,941 issued on April 24, 1928, upon an original application filed January 31, 1925. We held that the Peterson patent was not infringed by the defendant and remanded the case so far as the Ottenheimer patent was concerned to afford both parties a full opportunity to present evidence bearing upon all the issues involved.
The general purpose of both patents was to provide a showcase for perishable foods wherein they may…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hailes v. Van WormerSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Grinnell Washing MacHine Co. v. E. E. Johnson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Roberts v. RyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Powers-Kennedy Contracting Corp. v. Concrete Mixing & Conveying Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Richards v. Chase Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bulldog Electric Products Co. v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
- Hartford-Empire Co. v. Swindell Bros.District Court, D. Maryland · 1937
- Wolff v. Stewart & Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1937
- Atlantic Refining Co. v. James B. Berry Sons Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937