Legal Opinion

United States v. Rubel

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 7, 2020No. 18-2725Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

18-2725 United States v. Rubel UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007 IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. United States v. CaveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  3. Packingham v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  4. United States v. RigasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. VillafuerteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API