Legal Opinion
McVinney v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided March 31, 2022No. 4:21-cv-00565Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION BARRY McVINNEY and DIANE McVINNEY PLAINTIFFS v. Case No. 4:21-cv-00565-KGB STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY DEFENDANT ORDER Before the Court is defendant State Farm Fire and Casualty Company’s (“State Farm”) motion for partial dismissal (Dkt. No. 4). Plaintiffs Barry McVinney and Diane McVinney (“the McVinneys”) responded in opposition (Dkt. No. 9), and State Farm replied (Dkt. No. 18). Also before the Court are the McVinneys’ motions for extension of time for leave to add parties (Dkt. Nos. 15, 16) and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Denise Blomker v. Sally JewellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Benton S. Coons v. Norman Y. Mineta, Secretary, Department of Transportation Marion C. Blakely, Administrator, Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.