Legal Opinion

In re Extradition of Wadge

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 27, 1883PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Habeas Corpus.

1Opinion of the CourtBeown, J.

The prisoner having been held for extradition, under the treaty with Great Britain, on a charge of forgery, has been brought before me on habeas corpus and certiorari. The authentication of the documents excepted to is made in the exact language of the statute of August 3,1882, § 5, and by the proper officers, and the signature of the police magistrate is also verified by oral proof. It is likewise shown that the documents were authenticated for the purpose of being used in these extradition proceedings. From the oral 'evidence, therefore, in connection with the authentication, the intention…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re HenrichU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1867
  2. President & Trustees v. PatchenCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1831
  3. In re FarezU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1870
  4. In re MacdonnellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1873

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Collins v. LoiselSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. In Re the Requested Extradition of SindonaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  3. Jose Munoz Santos v. Linda ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. In re EzetaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1894
  5. United States v. Jane Kember, United States of America v. Morris BudlongCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API