Pinnell v. Yellow Cab Company
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The order of the trial judge in sustaining the general demurrer was in part as follows: “It will thus be seen that the cause of action, if any, must be sustained solely on the charge that the injury plaintiff sustained was proximately caused by the taxicab driver picking up this additional passenger. Though it is charged that the picking up of the additional passenger was in violation of the contract of hire, this allegation is a mere conclusion, and no facts are set out showing the terms and condi tions of the contract of hire, and even though it could be said that picking up the passenger…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Andrews & Co. v. KinselSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Bowers v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. BoyleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Yellow Cab Co. v. CarmichaelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Daigrepont v. Teche Greyhound Lines Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corporation v. StanfieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Milton Bradley Co. of Ga. v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Southeastern Stages, Inc. v. StringerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
- Skelton v. GambrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Walker v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.