United States v. Lai Ming Tanu
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GURFEIN, Circuit Judge:
This appeal raises questions concerning delay in bringing a defendant to trial in the federal court after dismissal of state charges arising out of the same transaction. There is no problem of double jeopardy, United States v. Lanza, 260 U.S. 377, 43 S.Ct. 141, 67 L.Ed. 314 (1922); Abbate v. United States, 359 U.S. 187, 79 S.Ct. 666, 3 L.Ed.2d 729 (1959), and there would be no doubt that the federal indictment was properly brought if the question of delay were not involved.
The District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Hon. Jack B. Weinstein, Judge) dismissed…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- United States v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- United States v. William T. MarlerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Sam T. Iaquinta, Velma E. Shine, United States of America v. Sam Thomas Iaquinta, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Ronald E. PurhamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Albert E. Mills. United States of America v. Kenneth B. WonsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.