Legal Opinion

Crowder v. Haymaker

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 14, 1935PublishedCited by 28 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Industrial Commission of Virginia. John G. Haymaker, claimant, was in jured while working in a coal mine. By an accidental explosion of dynamite he has been blinded in one eye and vision in the other is almost destroyed. The Commission was of the opinion that this injury arose out of and in the course of his employment by Roy C. Crowder (his employer), and has found accordingly, Commissioner Nickels dissenting. The judgment is against Crowder as employer and the Bituminous Casualty Company as insurer.

If we accept as true complainant’s version of all…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Franklin Coal & Coke Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Baker v. NussmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1929
  4. McKinstry v. Guy Coal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  5. Mann v. City of LynchburgSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. GillSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
  2. Intermodal Services, Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  3. Epperson v. DeJarnetteSupreme Court of Virginia · 1935
  4. Hann v. Times-Dispatch Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1936
  5. Stover v. RatliffSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API