Legal Opinion

Burrell v. Norton

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided August 2, 1974No. Civ. H-148PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BLUMENFELD, District Judge.

In this action plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of § 5030(6) of the Connecticut Welfare Manual, Volume 1, which pertains to emergency assistance to welfare recipients in certain “catastrophic” circumstances. A cause of action is stated under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and jurisdiction is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3). Plaintiffs seek declaratory and other relief, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201, 2202, Fed.R.Civ.P. 57, but do not seek injunctive relief. 1

The intervening plaintiff Valestine McNatt and the defendant Commissioner of Welfare…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Baxstrom v. HeroldSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. McGinnis v. RoysterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Jimenez v. WeinbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stratos v. Department of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Williams v. WohlgemuthCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  3. Bacon v. ToiaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
  4. Williams v. WohlgemuthDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Ingerson v. SharpDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API