Legal Opinion

United States Borax & Chemical Corp. v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided June 29, 1993No. 92-841Published

1Opinion of the Court

506 N.W.2d 456 (1993)

UNITED STATES BORAX & CHEMICAL CORPORATION, Appellee,

v.

ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY; ADM/Growmark River System, Inc. a/k/a ADM/Growmark a/k/a ADM Grain Company, Tabor Grain Co. a/k/a Tabor Grain & Co. a/k/a Tabor Grain, Appellants.

No. 92-841.

Court of Appeals of Iowa.

June 29, 1993.

Craig D. Warner of Aspelmeier, Fisch, Power, Warner & Enberg, Burlington, for appellants.

Terry D. Loeschen and John M. Loeschen of Loeschen & Loeschen, Burlington, for appellee.

Heard by OXBERGER, C.J., and DONIELSON, J., and McCARTNEY, Senior Judge.[*]

DONIELSON, Judge.

On April 3, 1987, a fire…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Larsen v. United Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  2. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. VoeltzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  3. Long v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  4. Waukon Auto Supply v. Farmers & Merchants Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  5. Becker v. D & E DISTRIBUTING CO.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API