Legal Opinion

Tremayne v. American SMW Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 14, 1954No. Civ. 19946PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment in favor of plaintiff in an action to recover upon a written guaranty of an account, after trial before the court without a jury, defendants Timothy L. Woods and James Woods, hereinafter referred to as defendants, appeal.

Facts: * Defendant American SMW Corporation became indebted to plaintiffs’ assignor for goods, wares and merchandise furnished to said defendants in the sum of $7,533.14. Defendants guaranteed the foregoing account by a writing reading as follows:

“In consideration of the extension of credit to American SMW Corp., whose business is conducted at 118 W. 5th…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. IsenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. McFerren v. Goldsmith-Stern Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
  3. Frieden v. Cluett, Peabody & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  4. Grade v. County of MariposaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Earl L. Carter, D/B/A Highland Farms, Bankrupt. Wells Fargo Bank v. Earl L. Carter, D/B/A Highland Farms, Debtor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  2. Evans v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Bonzer v. City of Huntington ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Dairyman's Cooperative Creamery Assn. v. LeipoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Bottom v. BottomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API