Legal Opinion

Des Moines Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Eisenmenger

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 6, 1931No. 28,352PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

In this action to foreclose a first mortgage, plaintiffs got a decree by default March 13, 1929. A sale of the premises, a Martin county farm, was had and confirmed by order April 27, 1929. Later a motion was made by Farmers State Bank of Sherburn, Inc. one of the defendants, which held a mortgage junior to that of plaintiffs, for an order vacating the decree and permitting it to appear and defend the action on the merits. The only purpose was to enable the mover to assert and protect a lien for taxes on the mortgaged premises, which it had purchased at a delinquent tax sale before this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. BulteMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. State Bank of Milan v. SylteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Norton v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  4. Minneapolis Investment Co. v. National Security Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Peart v. District of Columbia Housing AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Koch v. Kiron State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  3. Riley v. Bank of Commerce of RoswellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Moore v. CrispSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  5. Moore v. CrispSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API