Legal Opinion
Pauly v. Biotronik, GmbH
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided May 24, 1990No. Civ. 90-100-REPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REDDEN, Judge:
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Pauly and Pena filed a complaint for breach of contract, fraud and declaratory judgment. The breach of contract claim involves oral and written promises allegedly made by defendants to the effect that if plaintiffs would move to Oregon and start up a company (Micro Systems Engineering — “MSE”) to design, develop and fabricate hybrid circuits for pace makers to be sold by MSE to MSE’s parent company, defendant Biotronik, plaintiffs would have an ownership interest in MSE; they would be paid a percentage of participation in the sales of MSE; and they…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tolbert Dean Spradlin v. Lear Siegler Management Services Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Mittendorf v. Stone Lumber Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1994