Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dix-Ferndale Taxpayers' Ass'n v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1932No. Docket No. 168, Calendar No. 35,626Published

1DissentSharpe, J.

The “questions involved” in this case are stated by counsel for appellants in their brief as follows:

“1. A highway was widened in such a manner as to result in no benefit up to the present time to property included in the special assessment district. The evidence showed no condition now existing from which it can be inferred that a future benefit will arise. Are such assessments legal upon the theory that benefits might possibly accrue in the future?
“2. If the assessing officers, iff good faith, regard as probable, benefits to the extent’ and in the proportion that they lay a special…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Marks v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Lawrence v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Hatch v. Michigan Central Railroad Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Roberts v. City of SanduskyMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API