Hargis Bank & Trust Co. v. Gambill
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
(Opinion of the Court by
Judge Willis
Affirming.
Tbe problem presented is to determine tbe principle tbat governs tbe application by tbe court of tbe proceeds of mortgaged property sold under a decree to tbe several debts secured by tbe mortgage. A statement of tbe ultimate facts showing bow tbe problem arose will aid in its solution. G. W. Gambill was indebted to tbe Hargis Bank & Trust Company on several notes aggregating $17,600. One of tbe notes • for $8,000 was unsecured, another for $7,000 was indorsed by tbe debtor’s father, and a third for $2,600 was indorsed by tbe debtor’s brother. Tbe…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Orleans County National Bank v. MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Campbell v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1836
- Chatten v. Knoxville Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1926
- Fielder v. VarnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1871
- Moore v. MoberlyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1847
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Thunderbird, Ltd. v. Great Am. Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Stockman v. J.C. Industries, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Nestle Ice Cream Co. v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- State Bank of Streeter v. NesterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- F. D. Cline Paving Co. v. Southland Speedways, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.