Legal Opinion

Burtis v. Industrial Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 5, 1995No. 2-94-1417WCPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rarick

Claimant, Richard Burtis, sought benefits pursuant to the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) (820 ILCS 305/1 et seq. (West 1992)) for injuries sustained in the employ of respondent, Cassens Transport Corporation (Cassens).

Burtis applied for employment and was hired at Cassens’ facility in Belvidere, Illinois, on January 13, 1984, as a driver of a car-hauling truck. Burtis was trained at the Belvidere facility and worked out of the Belvidere terminal until November 1990, at which time he voluntarily transferred to Cassens’ new facility in Smyrna, Tennessee. From that point on, Burtis received his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Forrest McCluney v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  2. United Airlines, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  3. F & E Erection Co. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  4. United States Steel Corp. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. Carroll v. Industrial Com'n of IllinoisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. D.J. Masonry Co. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  2. Mahoney v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Correct Construction Co., Inc. v. Industrial Comm'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  4. Cowger v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  5. Cowger v. ICAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API