State v. Swing
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtS. Powell, P.J.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, John M. Swing, appeals from his conviction in the Clermont County Court of Common Pleas for three counts of sexual imposition following a jury trial. For the reasons outlined below, we affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
{¶ 2} At all times relevant, Swing, who was then 50 years old, was employed as a *834sergeant with the Miami Township Police Department ("MTPD"). Swing worked for MTPD for 18 years. The victim in this case, A.H., who was then just 20 years old, was a participant in MTPD's Explorer Program ("Explorer Program"). The Explorer Program is a program for young…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Riley v. Cal. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. ShortNebraska Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. RogersOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. ScottOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. StarcherOhio Court of Appeals · 2026
- Esposito v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.