Legal Opinion
Gadsden v. United States
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided January 25, 1944No. 2623PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHESNUT, District Judge.
In this case, the libellant, as widow and the declared beneficiary of her deceased husband, Philip Gadsden, is seeking to recover $5,000 on a seaman’s war risk insurance policy. The respondents in the case are the United States of America, the War Shipping Administration and A. H. Bull & Co., a corporation. As no evidence was offered to show any liability on the War Shipping Administration or A. H. Bull & Company, the case will be considered only as against the United States.
The case has been submitted upon testimony and arguments of counsel and the court makes the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Meaney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Flannagan v. Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
- Long v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
- Krug v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. MearsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States ex rel. Thompson v. DyeDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1954
- Quinn v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1947
- Ferro v. United States Lines Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947
- Sutton v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1947
- Carson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.