Legal Opinion

Sutton v. United States

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 30, 1947No. 24447PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, District Judge.

Libelant, as the widow and designated beneficiary of her deceased husband, Captain Edgar Sutton, seeks recovery of death benefits as provided in the Group Life and Disability Insurance Policy issued by respondent, known as Second Seamen’s War Risk Policy (46 U.S.C.A. § 1101 et seq.) as amended March 24, 1943.

The facts giving rise to the controversy, briefly stated:

Decedent’s vessel, SS. Hall Young, while under his command and as it was docked at the Port of Darwin, Australia, was subjected to a swift and unexpected enemy attack and aerial bombardment by Japanese planes…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Silverstein v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  3. United States v. PatryasSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Straw v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
  5. Howard v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rogel v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1949
  2. Shrader v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API