Legal Opinion
Texas & Pacific R. Co. v. Rosborough
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 14, 1914No. 357PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
235 U.S. 429 (1914)
TEXAS & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY
v.
ROSBOROUGH.
No. 357.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued November 30, 1914.
Decided December 14, 1914.
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.
Mr. F.H. Prendergast, with whom Mr. W.L. Hall was on the brief, for plaintiff in error.
Mr. S.P. Jones, with whom Mr. William Thompson and Mr. J.S. Patterson were on the brief, for defendants in error.
Memorandum opinion by MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS, by direction of the court.
This cause was removed from the state court to the District Court and comes here solely because plaintiff in error…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Grand Trunk Railroad v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Chicago Junction Railway Co. v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. HowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Goodman v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Perry v. Branning Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Clawson v. BlackIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
- Bristol Gas & Electric Co. v. BoyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
- Overstreet v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1916
- Allen-Wright Furniture Co. v. HinesIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.