Legal Opinion
Arutt v. Multer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 17, 1973PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
The petitioners instituted this proceeding under article 78 of the CPLR in the nature of prohibition to direct the respondent, a Justice of the Supreme Court, “ to resettle'” an ex parte order heretofore made by him, dated September 18, 1973 and entered in Richmond County, in a proceeding entitled “ Matter of the General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Fillies & Fellows, Inc., assignor, to Samuel A. Arutt, assignee ”, solely to the extent of striking therefrom the respondent’s designation of an auctioneer and substituting therefor the assignee’s designation of an auctioneer.
Prohibit…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re the General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of John C. Creveling & Son Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Fisher Bookbinding Co.New York Supreme Court · 1983
- In re Empire Furniture Factories, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- In re the General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Sound Spectrum of Nassau, Ltd., New York County Courts1986
- Aluminum Alloys Corp. v. CohenNew York Supreme Court · 1990
- In re Premier Container Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980