Legal Opinion

Tate v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1982No. 5632PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROONEY, Justice.

Appellants-plaintiffs’ complaint in this case sets forth two claims for relief; one founded on negligence and one founded on breach of contract, both of which resulted from the same incident. Appellants and appellee-defendant entered into an agreement whereby appellee agreed to furnish and install a “call director” and a private branch exchange service (hereinafter referred to as PBX) at appellants’ business location for use in operation of an answering service. Appellants contend that the delay in the installation of the PBX damaged them in the amount of $30,000.00. In its…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Amoco Production Co. v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Danculovich v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Brittain v. BoothWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Fuchs Murane v. GoeWyoming Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Tri-County Electric Ass'n v. City of GilletteWyoming Supreme Court · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. McCullough v. Golden Rule Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  2. JBC of Wyoming Corp. v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Schutkowski v. CareyWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Ricci v. New Hampshire Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  5. United States Ex Rel. Farmers Home Administration v. RedlandWyoming Supreme Court · 1985

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API