Legal Opinion

State v. McCray

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided June 25, 1998No. 97-2746-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoggensack, J.

Kelly McCray appeals his conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to deliver, based on the denial of a suppression motion which focused on evidence seized following the execu tion of a no-knock warrant at someone else's house. Me Cray asserts that the factual allegations upon which the warrant was based were insufficient to justify its issuance under recent United States Supreme Court precedent. However, because the evidence established that at the time the warrant was executed McCray was on the premises without permission, we conclude he lacks standing to assert a Fourth Amendment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Richards v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. State v. DrogsvoldCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Granados v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  2. State of West Virginia v. Lamar DorseyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. OrtaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
  4. State v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
  5. Granados v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API