Legal Opinion

Westmoreland v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 7, 2006No. A06A1159PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Presiding Judge.

A jury found Marshall Lee Westmoreland guilty of burglary. His motion for new trial was denied, and he appeals. Westmoreland raises two enumerations of error, claiming that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a continuance and that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. We find no error and affirm.

1. On the morning of his trial, Westmoreland informed his counsel that he could identify the man who actually committed the crime. Based on this information Westmoreland’s counsel moved for a continuance so he could investigate Westmoreland’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ealey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. Woodward v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  4. Couch v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Villegas v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  2. State v. LangdellSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  3. Gipson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  4. Billings v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  5. In the Interest of R. H.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API