Legal Opinion

Barmby v. Wolfe

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1895No. 6078PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from the district court of Gage county. Tried below before Babcock, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

Wolfe sued the plaintiffs in error, who are husband and wife, on a promissory note purporting to be signed by the plaintiffs in error, payable to the order of R. Holben, and by Holben indorsed to Wolfe as collateral security to a loan made by Wolfe to Holben. The Barmbys filed sepá*78rate answers; there was a verdict against both; they filed separate motions for a new trial, which were overruled, and they bring the case here on separate petitions in error. We shall first consider the case of William Barmby.

By his answer he averred that since the making of the note it had been, without…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Carleton v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Housh v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. St. Louis v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Haas v. Bank of CommerceNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Murphy v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1884

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Benton v. SikytaNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Wyoming Inv. Co. v. Wax Et Ux.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Beavers v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Fitzgerald v. Kimball Bros.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Hammond v. EdwardsNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API