Legal Opinion
Wilkins v. Burgess
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 31, 2006PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Carey, J.H.O.) dated March 9, 2005, which denied her cross motion to extend the time to serve the summons and complaint pursuant to CPLR 306-b.
*795Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiffs cross motion pursuant to CPLR 306-b for an extension of time to serve the summons and complaint (see Leader v Maroney, Ponzini & Spencer, 97 NY2d 95 [2001]). The plaintiff failed to establish…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Leader v. Maroney, Ponzini & SpencerNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Slate v. Schiavone Construction CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Kazimierski v. New York UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by7 opinions
- Calloway v. WellsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Khodeeva v. Chi Chung YipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Redman v. South Island Orthopaedic Group, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Umana v. SofolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Meusa v. BMW Financial ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.