Legal Opinion

Diebert, Bancroft & Ross Co. v. Bertie Sugar Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 21, 1912No. 19,578PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action by Emile Sunbery against Chauffe Bros, to foreclose. Diebert, Bancroft & Ross Company, Limited, bankrupts, and others, intervene, and certain property was adjudicated to Sunbery, and certain personalty to Diebert, 'Bancroft & Ross Company and another. From an order refusing to permit the Bertie Sugar Company to dissolve plaintiff’s injunction on bond, the Bertie Sugar Company applies for a writ of mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtBreaux, C. J.

Relator asks for an order to issue to the district judge, directing him to grant a suspensive appeal from his order refusing to permit him to dissolve plaintiffs’ injunction on bond.

Relator was the owner of a plantation in the parish of Assumption. In the sugar factory on the place there is a cane crusher, consisting of several large iron rollers, gearing, and engine. The plantation was seized *415in foreclosure proceedings by plaintiff, E. Sunbery, in tbe case of E. Sunbery v. Chauffe Bros.

Prior to the sale, the firm of Bancroft, Ross & Sinclair Company intervened by way of third opposition,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Board of Liquidating Com'rs of Bank v. DodsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pompano Horse Club, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. BryanSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. Town of Boynton v. State Ex Rel. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  3. First Evangelist Baptist Church v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API