Legal Opinion

Ford v. City of Birmingham

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided May 16, 1950No. 6 Div. 970PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARR, Judge.

In the circuit court the accused was charged and convicted on this complaint: “Comes the City of Birmingham, Alabama, a municipal corporation, and complains that Phillip Ford within twelve months before the beginning of this prosecution and within the City of Birmingham, or the police jurisdiction thereof, did possess tickets, writings, papers, slips, documents, or memorandums of a kind which are customarily or usually used in the operation of a lottery, policy game, or other game of chance, contrary to and in violation of Section 600 of the General City Code of Birmingham of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. BensonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  3. Pace v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  4. McLosky v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  5. Lipscomb v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pierce v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Holloway v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Robinson v. City of SylacaugaAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. Tucker v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950
  5. Maddox v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API