Legal Opinion

Fairbanks v. United States

District Court, D. Montana

Decided January 2, 1936No. 983PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PRAY, District Judge.

This is an action to recover on a war risk insurance contract. The case was tried by the court without a jury, and decision was delayed for an unusual length of time, ■ due partly to the request of defendant to submit further testimony at a later date, leave having been granted therefor. The supplementary transcript was not filed in the case until later, and was followed some time thereafter by briefs of counsel. According to the Lumbra v. U. S. Case (290 U.S. 551, 54 S.Ct. 272, 78 L.Ed. 492), the fact, as here, that plaintiff waited ten or twelve years before commencing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lumbra v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. White v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. United States v. StephensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  4. United States v. LawsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
  5. United States v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. FairbanksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API