Legal Opinion

Hornsby v. Tingle

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 17, 1961No. C-226PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellee has moved to dismiss this appeal for failure of appellant to assign error in accordance with Florida Appellate Rule 3..S, subd. c, 31 F.S.A., which provides:

“The assignments of error shall point out clearly and distinctly all alleged errors of the lower court relied on for reversal. Where the alleged errors are based on orders, evidence or charges such matters shall be specifically referred to, and where based on a motion for new trial, the grounds relied on shall he pointed out.”

The only assignment of error herein reads:

“The Court erred in the making and entering of its Final Decree…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCann Plumbing Co. v. Plumbing Industry ProgramDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  2. American Express Co. v. CochraneSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  3. Bybee v. StearnSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  4. Durrance v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fort v. FortDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  2. Gregg v. State Road DepartmentDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API