Legal Opinion

K.O. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 18, 2016No. Nos. 1D16-1065, 1D16-1066, 1D16-1067, 1D16-1069, 1D16-1070, 1D16-1071, 1D16-1073, 1D16-1074, 1D16-1075PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER STRIKING ANDERS BRIEF

2Per curiam

Appellant filed an initial brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), which requires that this court independently “examine the record to the extent necessary to discover any errors apparent on the face of the record.” State v. Causey, 503 So.2d 321, 322 (Fla.1987). Upon review by the court, it appears that'a sentencing error may exist. The Final Disposition Order is void of notation as to the length of Appellant’s probation. The trial court did not address the length of time Appellant is to serve on probation or…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. CauseySupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  3. J.M.W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  4. S.T. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. NORRIS HUBBARD, JR. v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API