Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Hiles

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 18, 1982No. 3-977A234PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUCHANAN, Chief Judge.

CASE SUMMARY

Plaintiffs-appellants James D. Cunningham, Fred M. Lutgen, Jr., and Ross Haller (adjacent landowners) appeal the trial court’s denial of their Petition for Contempt Citation against Doug Hiles (hereinafter referred to as Hiles) arising out of the granting of an injunction enforcing a restrictive land covenant.

We reverse and remand with the instruction to cite Hiles for contempt.

This cause is before the Court of Appeals for the third time. Because of the contempt aspects involved, the Third District judges who decided the previous appeal have disqualified…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Thornton Ex Rel. Thornton v. PenderIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  2. McFarlan v. Fowler Bank City Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Denny v. State Ex Inf. BradyIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Egbert v. EGBERTIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
  5. In the Matter of LemondIndiana Supreme Court · 1980

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fisher v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Moxley v. Indiana National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Cunningham v. HilesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Davidson v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Davidson v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API