Legal Opinion
First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 3, 1986No. 85 Civ. 4163(MEL)PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LASKER, District Judge.
Memel, Jacobs, Pierno, Gersh & Ells-worth (“Memel Jacobs”) and John J. Giovannone move pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2), 12(b)(3), 12(b)(6), and 9(b) to dismiss the supplemental third-party complaint filed against them by Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co. (“OAD”) for lack of personal jurisdiction, improper venue, failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, and failure to plead fraud with particularity. The motion is granted in part and denied in part.
I. Background
The third-party action as to which this motion has been made arises from the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Neilson v. Union Bank of California, N.A.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
- Go-Video, Inc. v. Akai Electric Company, Ltd., and Matsushita Electric Industrial Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- The Ltd., Inc. v. McCrory Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Bozsi Ltd. Partnership v. LynottDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.