Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Hickman

District Court, M.D. Georgia

Decided March 24, 1999No. 5:97-cv-00082PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

OWENS, District Judge.

Before the court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Tab # 45]. Having carefully considered the arguments presented, the relevant case law and the record as a whole, the court issues the following order.

I. Facts

The following are the facts given in a light most favorable to the non-movant (plaintiff). During the period of time in which the alleged incidences of sexual harassment occurred, Defendant Mike Hickman was the principal of Mary Persons High School and Defendant Charles Dumas was the Superintendent of the Monroe County School Board of Education.…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brooks v. H.J. Russell & Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API