Legal Opinion
In re the Annexation Proposed by Ordinance No. X-01-93
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided July 28, 1995No. 02A03-9411-CV-425PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARRARD, Judge.
This case involves an Indiana city's annexation of land. Landowners of the annexed property sought to remonstrate against the annexation (Count I) and to seek a declaratory judgment that the annexation ordinance was void, illegal, invalid and of no force and effect (Count II). The trial court dismissed the remonstrance since it lacked the necessary signatures. Landowners appeal, claiming the court erred in striking certain signatures and in allowing conclusion testimony. We affirm.
FACTS
On March 9, 1998, the City of Fort Wayne enacted an ordinance annexing certain…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fowler v. CampbellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Szakaly v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
- DOAN v. City of Fort WayneIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
- MONARCH INDUS., ETC. v. Model Coverall ServiceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- Abell v. City of SeymourIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sons v. City of Crown PointIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Prock v. Town of DanvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- City of Kokomo Ex Rel. Goodnight v. PogueIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010