Legal Opinion

United States v. Ricardo Palomino

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 12, 1996No. 93-6364PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILER, Circuit Judge.

Defendant, Ricardo Palomino, appeals his jury conviction for possession with the intent to distribute cocaine. He contends that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence. Palomino further argues that the evidence introduced by the prosecution was insufficient to support a finding of guilt. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

I. Facts

Mark Kellerhall, a patrolman with the Shelby County Sheriff’s Department, was conducting a radar check on Interstate 240 around midnight-on August 22, 1992. His radar indicated Palomino’s car to be travel-ling…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. United States v. Wendell LayneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. John Jay Hill and Malcolm Scott HillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. Darwin Jay Copeland Anthony Antoine HartwellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  4. Bletz v. GribbleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. William Edward RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API