Antwine Equality Graves v. State of Mississippi
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
MAXWELL, J.,
for the Court:
¶ 1. The Mississippi Supreme Court ordered an evidentiary.hearing on Antwine Equality Graves’s post-conviction relief (PCR) motion. The sole issue was the recantation of a witness from Graves’s murder trial. As directed, the circuit judge conducted the hearing but was not swayed by the recanting witness’s affidavit or his new testimony that he did not really see Graves shoot the victim. So the circuit judge denied Graves’s request for a new trial. After review, we find-the-judge’s denial was supported by substantial evi dence and was not clearly erroneous. We thus…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Williams v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
- Bradley v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1968
- ANTWINE EQUALITY GRAVES v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2005
- Turner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2000
- Timothy B. Sharp v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Justin James v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016
- Christopher B. Franks a/k/a Christopher Franks v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2021
- Detrius Roberson v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2022