Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Emory

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 15, 1941No. 33Published

1DissentJustice Reed

The purpose and provisions of the National Housing Act1 lead me to the conclusion that § 3466 of the Revised *434Statutes is inapplicable to the claim of the Administrator in this case.2

A statute is not to be interpreted by its text alone, as though it were a specimen under laboratory control. It takes meaning from other enactments forming the whole body of law bearing upon its subject.3 If, like § 3466, it has been upon the books for years, the precedents interpreting its meaning must be considered in connection with it, particularly when, as here, new legislation is passed which may be…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. United States v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1805
  3. Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Sloan Shipyards Corp. v. United States Shipping Bd. Emergency Fleet CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API