Legal Opinion

People v. Northcutt

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 1, 1940No. Crim. 451PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

The defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction on a charge of bringing embezzled prop erty, an automobile, into the State of California, in violation of the provisions of section 497 of the Penal Code.

The sole ground, of appeal is that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the appellant’s request to be allowed to withdraw his plea of guilty and enter one of not guilty. The appellant relies upon People v. Schwarz, 201 Cal. 309 [257 Pac. 71], and People v. Grant, 97 Cal. App. 60 [274 Pac. 1005, 275 Pac. 838], In the first of these cases the court said that it was well settled…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. SchwarzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. People v. SminkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. The Williams Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. People v. AseltineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. People v. GrantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. CarusoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. People v. FratiannoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. People v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API