Legal Opinion
State v. Medicine
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 10, 2015No. 27205PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1.] The State appeals the circuit court’s order granting Eric E. Medicine’s motion in limine and motion to suppress blood evidence obtained by law enforcement after initiating a traffic -stop. The arresting officer first informed Medicine that he had impliedly consented to a blood draw by virtue of operating a vehicle in South Dakota, but then asked if Medicine consented to the blood draw. Medicine consented. The State asserts the totality of the circumstances supports a conclusion that Medicine’s consent was voluntary. We affirm. •
Facts and Procedural History
[¶…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Francisco L Encinas ValenzuelaArizona Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. FischerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. HemmingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. KlineSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. RandleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.