Legal Opinion

Provident Life Accident Ins. Co. v. Hollums

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 30, 1925No. 6 Div. 172PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SOMERVILLE,

J. The accident policy here sued on contains a provision, stipulating on the part of the insured that;

“If any payment [of premiums] be not made by 12 o’clock noon, standard time, of the day when due, as above specified, all my rights under said policy and the rights of the beneficiary thereunder shall then and thereby become void, and that my policy can be reinstated only at the option of the company, and as provided in the policy, and that no claim for loss arising between the time of' such forfeiture and reinstatement shall be valid against the company.”

The policy contains also…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Washburn v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  2. Galliher v. State Mutual Life Ins.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  3. Satterfield v. Fidelity Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Norris v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. Imperial Life Insurance v. GlassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. North Carolina Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. TerrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. BrandtSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  3. Ross v. State Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  5. Henderson v. Nationwide Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API